BIT DIGITAL INC (BTBT)

Sector: Information Technology

    Home/Companies/BTBT/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

BIT DIGITAL INC · Meeting: July 29, 2026

Policy v1.2medium confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

3

Directors AGAINST

2

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Re-Election of Directors

3 FOR/2 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Zhaohui DengTSR underperformance: 3-year price return -42% versus MVIS ETF fallback; director tenure since September 2020 covers full underperformance periodconflict of interest: indirect beneficial owner of Preference Shares that carry 50 votes each, benefiting from Proposal 2 quorum change

Mr. Deng has served since September 2020 and the stock has lost approximately 42% over the past three years — a negative absolute return — which triggers the director accountability screen under the ETF fallback (negative absolute TSR requires 30pp underperformance versus benchmark, easily exceeded); additionally, as a 70% beneficial owner of the Preference Shares being given outsized quorum weight under Proposal 2, he has a personal financial interest in weakening ordinary shareholder protections.

✗ AGAINST
Erke HuangTSR underperformance: 3-year price return -42%, director tenure since October 2019 covers full underperformance periodconflict of interest: 30% beneficial owner of Preference Shares benefiting from Proposal 2 quorum changeexecutive director serving as both CFO and director

Mr. Huang has served as a director since October 2019 and the stock has declined approximately 42% over the past three years, triggering the negative-absolute-TSR underperformance threshold under the ETF fallback; additionally, as a 30% beneficial owner of the Preference Shares that would gain dramatically more quorum power under Proposal 2, he has a direct personal interest that conflicts with ordinary shareholders.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Ichi Shih

Ms. Shih is a CPA with deep capital markets experience and serves as audit committee chair and financial expert, meeting the key qualifications required for her committee role; while the stock has underperformed during her tenure since September 2020, she holds no Preference Shares and has no conflicting financial interest in the Proposal 2 quorum change, and her audit oversight role provides meaningful governance value.

✓ FOR
Amanda Cassattrelated party: consulting agreement between company and Serotonin Inc., an entity she controls, paying $30,000/month

Ms. Cassatt joined the board on January 1, 2026, which is less than 24 months ago and therefore exempt from the TSR underperformance trigger under policy; the consulting relationship between the company and her firm Serotonin Inc. is a related-party arrangement that warrants monitoring, but it was disclosed and approved by the audit committee, and does not independently trigger a negative vote under the policy.

✓ FOR
Brock Pierce

Mr. Pierce has served since October 2021, giving him roughly a 2.5-year tenure that partially overlaps the underperformance period; under policy, directors who joined more than 24 months ago but less than 3 years ago are flagged but not automatically voted against if their tenure covers less than half the underperformance period — his tenure covers only part of the relevant window, and he holds no Preference Shares and has no conflict of interest in the governance proposals on this ballot.

Vote AGAINST Deng and Huang due to their long tenures spanning the full period of severe stock underperformance (negative 42% three-year return) and their direct personal financial interests in the quorum-weakening Proposal 2 via their ownership of Preference Shares; vote FOR Shih, Cassatt, and Pierce as they lack those conflicts and either have shorter tenures or provide critical audit expertise.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

Sam Tabar

Total Comp

N/A

Prior Support

N/A

no performance conditions: RSU awards to CEO and CFO vest based on time/board discretion with no disclosed financial or stock performance hurdlespay for performance misalignment: stock down approximately 42% over three years while CEO received $4.07M and CFO received $4.46M in fiscal 2025high fixed pay ratio: CEO base salary of $500,000 represents approximately 12% of total pay but cash bonus of $700,000 is discretionary with no disclosed metricsequity dilution: 15,000,000 shares reserved under 2026 plan represents approximately 4.3% of shares outstanding, above the 2-3% annual dilution red flag threshold

The proxy discloses that the board explicitly did not use financial performance measures to link compensation to outcomes, and all RSU awards to the CEO and CFO appear to vest based on time or board discretion rather than any measurable performance conditions — this means incentive pay is functioning as disguised fixed pay rather than true variable compensation, which is a clear AGAINST trigger under policy. Meanwhile, the stock has lost approximately 42% over three years while the CEO received over $4 million and the CFO received over $4.4 million in fiscal 2025 alone, with no evidence that below-target performance reduced payouts. The 2026 equity plan reserving 15 million shares (roughly 4.3% of shares outstanding) adds further dilution concerns on top of an already misaligned pay structure.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Audit Alliance, LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$242,055

Non-Audit Fees

$156,590

non audit fee ratio elevated: audit-related fees are 64.7% of audit fees, above the 50% threshold

The audit-related fees of $156,590 represent approximately 65% of audit fees of $242,055, which exceeds the 50% threshold in the policy and would normally trigger a AGAINST vote; however, there are no tax fees or other non-audit fees, the audit-related fees appear tied to core assurance work (review of interim statements and regulatory filings), and the company discloses no material restatements — on balance, the borderline ratio driven entirely by audit-adjacent services does not rise to the level of an independence concern, though shareholders should monitor this ratio going forward.

Overall Assessment

This ballot presents serious governance concerns at Bit Digital: two long-tenured insider directors with supervoting preferred stock are seeking to weaken the quorum threshold in a way that entrenches their control, executive pay lacks performance conditions despite severe stock underperformance, and a large new equity plan adds substantial dilution risk — shareholders should vote AGAINST Deng, Huang, the quorum amendment, and the equity plan while supporting the independent directors and the auditor ratification.

Filing date: June 8, 2026·Policy v1.2·medium confidence