COGENT COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS INC (CCOI)

Sector: Communication

    Home/Companies/CCOI/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

COGENT COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS INC · Meeting: May 1, 2026

Policy v1.2medium confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

8

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

8 FOR
✓ FOR
Dave Schaeffer

Schaeffer has served since 1999 and the company's 3-year total return of -65.8% underperforms XLC by -170.6pp, far exceeding the 30pp threshold for negative TSR, but the 3-year peer group comparison shows CCOI outperforming its disclosed peer median by +18.3pp (below the 20pp trigger), so the TSR trigger does not fire on the named-peer primary benchmark; no overboarding, attendance, or independence concerns are present.

✓ FOR
Marc Montagner

Montagner has served since April 2010 and brings extensive telecom and financial expertise; the 3-year peer group comparison shows CCOI outperforming its disclosed peer median by +18.3pp, which is below the 20pp trigger threshold, so no TSR-based concern fires, and no overboarding, attendance, or independence issues are present.

✓ FOR
Steven D. Brooks

Brooks has served since October 2003 and brings deep investment banking and technology experience; the 3-year peer group comparison shows CCOI outperforming its disclosed peer median by +18.3pp, below the 20pp trigger threshold, and no overboarding, attendance, or independence issues are present.

✓ FOR
Paul de Sa

De Sa joined in December 2021 and brings telecom regulatory and strategic expertise; the 3-year peer group comparison shows CCOI outperforming its disclosed peer median by +18.3pp, below the 20pp trigger threshold, and no overboarding, attendance, or independence issues are present.

✓ FOR
Lewis H. Ferguson III

Ferguson has served since October 2018 and brings exceptional audit oversight credentials as a former PCAOB board member; the 3-year peer group comparison shows CCOI outperforming its disclosed peer median by +18.3pp, below the 20pp trigger threshold, and no overboarding, attendance, or independence issues are present.

✓ FOR
Eve Howard

Howard joined in June 2022, just over 24 months ago, bringing capital markets and corporate governance expertise; the 3-year peer group comparison shows CCOI outperforming its disclosed peer median by +18.3pp, below the 20pp trigger threshold, and no overboarding, attendance, or independence issues are present.

✓ FOR
Deneen Howell

Howell joined in May 2022, just over 24 months ago, bringing executive compensation and corporate governance expertise; the 3-year peer group comparison shows CCOI outperforming its disclosed peer median by +18.3pp, below the 20pp trigger threshold, and no overboarding, attendance, or independence issues are present.

✓ FOR
Sheryl Kennedy

Kennedy has served since November 2019 and brings financial system oversight and risk management expertise; the 3-year peer group comparison shows CCOI outperforming its disclosed peer median by +18.3pp, below the 20pp trigger threshold, and no overboarding, attendance, or independence issues are present.

All eight directors are recommended FOR. Although CCOI's stock has fallen sharply (-65.8% over three years), the company's disclosed compensation peer group of Cable One, Rapid7, and Viavi Solutions shows CCOI actually outperforming the peer median by +18.3 percentage points over three years — below the 20pp threshold required to trigger a AGAINST vote under the named-peer primary benchmark. The peer group's median 3-year return was deeply negative (-84.1%), reflecting sector-wide distress among similar companies. No directors are overboarded, all met attendance requirements, all independent directors appear genuinely independent, and the board discloses a skills matrix.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

Dave Schaeffer

Total Comp

$25,372,519

Prior Support

88%%

CEO total compensation of $25,372,519 significantly above benchmark for Communication Services company at ~$904M market capDecember 2025 awards for 2026 service reported in 2025 Summary Compensation Table — a single large award covering a future year reported all at once, substantially inflating reported 2025 CEO payPay-for-performance misalignment: CEO variable pay far above benchmark while stock declined 65.8% over three years and 72.4% over one yearVariable pay above benchmark with TSR underperforming XLC sector ETF by 170.6pp over three years — well beyond the 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR

CEO Dave Schaeffer received total reported compensation of $25,372,519 for 2025, which is substantially above the benchmark for a CEO at a Communication Services company with a market cap of approximately $904 million — a market cap that has collapsed from a much higher level, meaning the benchmark itself already reflects lower expectations. A significant portion of this reported pay ($11.9 million) represents awards granted in December 2025 for services to be performed in 2026, meaning the company booked a single large award covering a future year all at once into the 2025 pay table, artificially inflating the reported figure; this is a compensation structure concern regardless of the accounting treatment. On the pay-for-performance alignment check, the CEO's variable (incentive) compensation was well above benchmark while shareholders experienced a 3-year stock decline of approximately 65.8% — the stock underperformed the XLC sector ETF benchmark by 170.6 percentage points over three years, far exceeding the 20-percentage-point threshold that triggers a No vote when absolute TSR is negative and variable pay is above benchmark. While the prior Say on Pay vote received 88% support (above the 70% threshold), the compensation structure itself — particularly the front-loaded 2026 awards inflating 2025 reported pay and the ongoing misalignment between executive pay levels and shareholder experience — warrants a AGAINST vote.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

N/A

Non-Audit Fees

N/A

Ernst & Young LLP is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of CCOI's size and complexity. The proxy filing does not include an auditor fee table with specific audit and non-audit fee amounts in the text provided, so the non-audit fee ratio trigger cannot be evaluated — per policy, the tenure trigger also requires confirmed data to fire and auditor tenure is not explicitly stated; absent confirmed data triggering a No vote, the default is FOR. No material financial restatements attributable to audit failure are disclosed.

Actual Vote Results

Meeting held May 1, 2026

View 8-K ↗

Other Proposals

Proposal 1

Approval of Third Amended and Restated Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. 2017 Incentive Award Plan

✓ Passed

Overall Assessment

The 2026 CCOI annual meeting presents eight director nominees (all recommended FOR given outperformance versus the disclosed peer group), auditor ratification of Ernst & Young (recommended FOR with no triggering fee or tenure data available), and a Say on Pay vote (recommended AGAINST due to a CEO pay level of $25.4 million that is substantially above benchmark for the company's current size, front-loaded 2026 awards inflating 2025 reported compensation, and severe pay-for-performance misalignment with shareholders having lost roughly two-thirds of their investment over three years). The equity plan approval (Proposal 2) is an equity plan type not yet covered by policy and is noted separately.

Filing date: March 20, 2026·Policy v1.2·medium confidence

Compensation Peer Group

3 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

CABOCable One
RPDRapid7
VIAVViavi Solutions