Proxyanalyst LogoProxyanalyst
CompaniesSpecial SituationsExplorerAbout
Terms and Conditions & Privacy PolicySitemap

GITLAB INC CLASS A (GTLB)

Sector: Information Technology

ExecutivesDirectorsTrendsAnnual MeetingProxy Filings
    Home/Companies/GTLB/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

GITLAB INC CLASS A · Meeting: June 17, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

2

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Class II Directors

2 FOR
✓ FOR
Karen Blasing

Blasing has served since August 2019 and GitLab's 3-year stock return (-23.1%) versus the company-disclosed peer group median (-22.7%) shows a gap of only -0.4 percentage points, well below the 20-point threshold needed to trigger a concern; she has relevant financial expertise as a former CFO, serves on the audit committee appropriately, holds two other public board seats (Autodesk and Zscaler) which is within the four-seat limit, and the proxy confirms she attended at least 75% of meetings.

✓ FOR
Godfrey Sullivan

Sullivan has served since January 2020 and the same peer-group TSR comparison (-0.4pp gap versus the 20pp trigger threshold) does not fire; he holds one other active public board seat (CrowdStrike), is within the overboarding limit, attended at least 75% of meetings, and brings extensive CEO and software-industry experience relevant to GitLab's business.

Both Class II nominees pass all policy screens: the peer-group TSR trigger does not fire (GTLB's 3-year return of -23.1% vs. peer median of -22.7% is a gap of only -0.4pp, far below the 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR), neither director is overboarded, both attended the required minimum of 75% of meetings, and each has clear relevant qualifications for the board.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

William Staples

Total Comp

$39,082,244

Prior Support

83.7%%

The prior Say on Pay vote received 83.7% support, well above the 70% threshold that would require demonstrated changes. The CEO's reported total compensation of $39.1 million is dominated by a large new-hire equity award granted at his December 2024 appointment — a single large award intended to cover multiple future years reported all at once — and the proxy discloses that his actual realized pay was approximately $5.1 million in fiscal year 2026 after performance stock awards tied to the fiscal year 2026 performance period were forfeited due to missed targets, demonstrating meaningful pay-for-performance alignment. The overall compensation program structure is sound: a majority of NEO pay is variable and at-risk, performance stock awards that missed threshold were forfeited (not paid out), annual cash incentives paid out at approximately 75% of target reflecting partial goal achievement, and the company maintains a clawback policy compliant with Dodd-Frank requirements.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

KPMG LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$2,796,500

Non-Audit Fees

$1,230,948

The non-audit fees (tax services of $1,230,948) represent approximately 44% of audit fees ($2,796,500), which is below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns; KPMG's tenure is not disclosed in the proxy so the tenure trigger cannot fire under policy; KPMG is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a $4.1 billion market-cap company; and no material financial restatements attributable to audit failure were identified.

Overall Assessment

GitLab's 2026 annual meeting ballot contains three standard proposals — director elections, auditor ratification, and Say on Pay — all of which pass policy screens and warrant a FOR vote. The key analytical finding is that while GitLab's stock has declined sharply versus the broad technology sector ETF (XLK), its 3-year return closely tracks its company-disclosed compensation peer group median, so the director TSR trigger does not fire; and the CEO's large reported compensation figure is substantially a new-hire multi-year equity award, with actual fiscal year 2026 realized pay well below the peer range after performance awards were forfeited for missing targets.

Filing date: May 1, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

19 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

APPFAppFolio
ASANAsana
BILLBill.com
BLBlackLine
BRZEBraze
CFLTConfluent
DTDynatrace
ESTCElastic N.V.
FIVNFive9
FRSHFreshworks
KVYOKlaviyo
MDBMongoDB
PCORProcore Technologies
QLYSQualys
RBRKRubrik
SSentinelOne
SMARSmartsheet
TENBTenable Holdings
PATHUiPath