KEMPER CORP (KMPR)

Sector: Financials

    Home/Companies/KMPR/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

KEMPER CORP · Meeting: May 6, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

2

Directors AGAINST

7

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

2 FOR/7 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Teresa A. Canida3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group: -90.8pp vs 20pp threshold (negative absolute TSR)Director since 2018 — tenure fully overlaps underperformance period5-year TSR also fails: KMPR -57.7% vs peer median +47.0%, gap of -104.7pp exceeds 20pp threshold

Ms. Canida has served since 2018, meaning her full tenure overlaps Kemper's severe stock underperformance — the company's 3-year return of -41% trailed the compensation peer group median of +49.8% by 90.8 percentage points, far exceeding the 20-point trigger; the 5-year check does not provide relief as the 5-year gap of -104.7pp also exceeds the threshold, confirming sustained underperformance.

✗ AGAINST
George N. Cochran3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group: -90.8pp vs 20pp threshold (negative absolute TSR)Director since 2015 — tenure fully overlaps underperformance period5-year TSR also fails: KMPR -57.7% vs peer median +47.0%, gap of -104.7pp exceeds 20pp threshold

Mr. Cochran has served since 2015, giving him the longest tenure of any director and full accountability for Kemper's sustained value destruction; the 3-year peer gap of -90.8pp and the 5-year gap of -104.7pp both far exceed the applicable 20-point trigger, leaving no mitigating 5-year track record to downgrade the vote.

✗ AGAINST
Jason N. Gorevic3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group: -90.8pp vs 20pp threshold (negative absolute TSR)Director since 2022 — over 24 months tenure, trigger applies5-year TSR check: insufficient 5-year tenure data; 3-year result governs

Mr. Gorevic joined in 2022, placing him beyond the 24-month new-director exemption; his tenure meaningfully overlaps the underperformance period and the 3-year peer gap of -90.8pp far exceeds the 20-point trigger; 5-year data is not applicable given his tenure length, so the 3-year result governs.

✗ AGAINST
Lacy M. Johnson3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group: -90.8pp vs 20pp threshold (negative absolute TSR)Director since 2016 — tenure fully overlaps underperformance period5-year TSR also fails: KMPR -57.7% vs peer median +47.0%, gap of -104.7pp exceeds 20pp threshold

Mr. Johnson has served since 2016, fully overlapping Kemper's period of severe stock underperformance; the 3-year peer gap of -90.8pp and the 5-year gap of -104.7pp both far exceed the applicable 20-point trigger, and no mitigating 5-year track record exists.

✗ AGAINST
Gerald Laderman3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group: -90.8pp vs 20pp threshold (negative absolute TSR)Director since 2020 — tenure meaningfully overlaps underperformance period5-year TSR also fails: KMPR -57.7% vs peer median +47.0%, gap of -104.7pp exceeds 20pp threshold

Mr. Laderman joined in 2020 and now serves as Independent Chairman, making him particularly accountable for board oversight; his tenure fully covers the 3-year and 5-year measurement windows, and both the 3-year gap of -90.8pp and 5-year gap of -104.7pp far exceed the 20-point trigger with no 5-year mitigant available.

✗ AGAINST
Stuart B. Parker3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group: -90.8pp vs 20pp threshold (negative absolute TSR)Director since 2020 — tenure meaningfully overlaps underperformance period5-year TSR also fails: KMPR -57.7% vs peer median +47.0%, gap of -104.7pp exceeds 20pp threshold

Mr. Parker has served since 2020, giving him tenure that fully overlaps both the 3-year and 5-year measurement windows; Kemper's 3-year peer underperformance of -90.8pp and 5-year underperformance of -104.7pp both far exceed the 20-point trigger, and the 5-year check confirms sustained rather than transient underperformance.

✗ AGAINST
Susan D. Whiting3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group: -90.8pp vs 20pp threshold (negative absolute TSR)Director since 2017 — tenure fully overlaps underperformance period5-year TSR also fails: KMPR -57.7% vs peer median +47.0%, gap of -104.7pp exceeds 20pp threshold

Ms. Whiting has served since 2017, fully overlapping Kemper's prolonged period of severe stock underperformance; the 3-year peer gap of -90.8pp and the 5-year gap of -104.7pp both far exceed the 20-point trigger, and no mitigating 5-year track record of adequate performance exists.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Suzet M. McKinneyDirector since 2024 — within 24-month new-director exemption

Dr. McKinney joined the board in 2024 and is exempt from the TSR underperformance trigger under the policy's 24-month grace period for new directors, which gives recently appointed directors reasonable time to contribute before being held accountable for prior-period stock performance.

✓ FOR
Alberto J. ParacchiniDirector since 2023 — within 24-month new-director exemption at assessment date; note: tenure is borderline at approximately 3 years

Mr. Paracchini joined in 2023; while his tenure is approaching the boundary of the 24-month exemption, the policy notes that directors joining more than 24 months but less than 3 years ago should be flagged but not automatically voted against if their tenure covers less than half the underperformance period — given he joined during an already-established period of underperformance and his tenure covers only a portion of the 3-year window, a FOR vote is appropriate with this noted as a flag.

Kemper's stock has lost 41% over three years while the company's own compensation peer group gained nearly 50% on average — a gap of over 90 percentage points that far exceeds the policy's 20-point trigger for directors overseeing a company with negative absolute returns. Seven of nine directors have tenures long enough to be held accountable for this sustained underperformance, and the 5-year check confirms the problem is not a recent blip. Two directors (McKinney and Paracchini) are either newly appointed or borderline on tenure and receive favorable votes under the new-director exemption or proportional assessment.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

C. Thomas Evans, Jr.

Total Comp

$3,090,806

Prior Support

82%%

CEO total compensation of $3.09M is below benchmark for a CEO at a $1.8B financial services company — no pay-level triggerPrior Say on Pay support of 82% exceeds the 70% threshold — no engagement failure triggerPay-for-performance: STI payouts were substantially below target (78% of target for interim CEO); 2023 PSU awards paid out at only 19% of target due to poor performance — incentive pay did reflect shareholder experienceSpecial retention RSUs granted in October 2025 are time-based without performance conditions — noted as a flag but justified by extraordinary management transition circumstances

The interim CEO's total compensation of approximately $3.1 million is modest relative to benchmarks for a CEO at a $1.8 billion financial services company, well within acceptable ranges. Short-term incentive payouts for all executives were meaningfully below target (77-83% of target) reflecting the company's below-target financial results, and the 2023 performance stock awards paid out at only 19% of target due to poor stock and operating performance — demonstrating that the incentive structure did punish underperformance. While special retention awards made in October 2025 vest purely based on continued employment without performance conditions, this is a limited and contextually justified response to an extraordinary management transition rather than a structural compensation design flaw, and the prior year Say on Pay support of 82% clears the 70% engagement threshold.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$4,977,000

Non-Audit Fees

$336,000

Tenure not disclosed in proxy — per policy, vote FOR when tenure cannot be confirmed; absence of disclosure noted as minor negative

Non-audit fees (audit-related fees of $115,000 plus tax fees of $221,000 = $336,000) represent approximately 6.8% of audit fees ($4,977,000), well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns; Deloitte is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a $1.8 billion market-cap company; auditor tenure is not disclosed but the policy requires confirmed data to trigger a No vote, so a FOR vote is appropriate with the absence of tenure disclosure noted.

Overall Assessment

Kemper's 2026 annual meeting ballot presents a company in significant distress — the stock has lost 41% over three years while peers gained 50%, triggering AGAINST votes for seven of nine directors under the TSR underperformance policy; the two exceptions are newly appointed directors who fall within the 24-month grace period. The Say on Pay vote earns a FOR based on a modest interim CEO pay package, below-target incentive payouts that appropriately reflected poor company performance, and 2023 performance awards that paid out at only 19% of target, while the auditor ratification also earns a FOR given negligible non-audit fees and an appropriate Big 4 firm.

Filing date: March 25, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

19 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

AFGAmerican Financial Group
AIZAssurant
CINFCincinnati Financial
CNACNA Financial
CNOCNO Financial Group
ERIEErie Indemnity
GLGlobe Life
HIGHartford Financial Services Group
HMNHorace Mann Educators
LNCLincoln National Corporation
MKLMarkel Group
MCYMercury General
PRAProAssurance
RLIRLI Corp
ROOTRoot
SAFTSafety Insurance Group
SIGISelective Insurance Group
THGThe Hanover Insurance Group
WRBW.R. Berkley Corporation