NEWMONT (NEM)

Sector: Materials

    Home/Companies/NEM/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

NEWMONT · Meeting: May 12, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

12

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Proposal One — Election of Directors

12 FOR
✓ FOR
Gregory H. Boyce

Director since October 2015; Newmont's 3-year price return of +130.0% outpaces the S&P 500 (^GSPC — S&P 500) by +69.6 percentage points, which is above the 65pp threshold required to trigger a vote against under our policy, so no TSR concern applies; no overboarding, attendance, or qualification issues identified.

✓ FOR
Bruce R. Brook

Director since October 2011; the same strong TSR outperformance versus the S&P 500 (^GSPC — S&P 500) applies; serves as Senior Independent Director and Audit Committee Chair with deep financial and mining expertise; no overboarding or attendance issues identified.

✓ FOR
Maura J. Clark

Director since April 2020; no TSR trigger applies given Newmont's +69.6pp outperformance of the S&P 500 (^GSPC — S&P 500) over three years; qualified CPA with extensive financial and energy-sector experience; no overboarding or attendance issues identified.

✓ FOR
Harry M. Conger

Director since June 2024, fewer than 24 months of tenure as of the meeting date, so the TSR trigger does not apply; brings over 46 years of mining operations experience; no overboarding or attendance issues identified.

✓ FOR
Emma FitzGerald

Director since December 2021; no TSR trigger applies given Newmont's strong outperformance of the S&P 500 (^GSPC — S&P 500); extensive CEO and energy-industry operational experience; no overboarding or attendance issues identified.

✓ FOR
Sally-Anne Layman

Director since November 2023; no TSR trigger applies given Newmont's strong outperformance of the S&P 500 (^GSPC — S&P 500); brings mining engineering and investment banking expertise; no overboarding or attendance issues identified.

✓ FOR
José Manuel Madero

Director since April 2021; no TSR trigger applies given Newmont's strong outperformance of the S&P 500 (^GSPC — S&P 500); brings Latin American operational and CEO-level management experience; no overboarding or attendance issues identified.

✓ FOR
René Médori

Director since April 2018; no TSR trigger applies given Newmont's strong outperformance of the S&P 500 (^GSPC — S&P 500); brings deep mining finance expertise as former Finance Director of Anglo American; no overboarding or attendance issues identified.

✓ FOR
Jane Nelson

Director since October 2011; no TSR trigger applies given Newmont's strong outperformance of the S&P 500 (^GSPC — S&P 500); brings distinguished sustainability and governance expertise from Harvard Kennedy School; no overboarding or attendance issues identified.

✓ FOR
Julio M. Quintana

Director since October 2015; no TSR trigger applies given Newmont's strong outperformance of the S&P 500 (^GSPC — S&P 500); serves as Compensation Committee Chair with extensive executive and operational experience; no overboarding or attendance issues identified.

✓ FOR
David T. Seaton

Director since April 2025, fewer than 24 months of tenure, so the TSR trigger does not apply; brings extensive large-scale project and CEO experience from Fluor Corporation; no overboarding or attendance issues identified.

✓ FOR
Natascha Viljoen

Director since January 2026 in her role as incoming President and CEO, fewer than 24 months of tenure so the TSR trigger does not apply; brings over 30 years of international mining operations experience including as prior CEO of Anglo American Platinum; no overboarding or attendance issues identified.

All twelve director nominees pass the policy screens: Newmont's 3-year total shareholder return of +130.0% outperforms the S&P 500 (^GSPC — S&P 500) by +69.6 percentage points, which does not meet the 65pp strong-positive threshold required to trigger a vote against under our policy. Five directors with tenure under 24 months are exempt from the TSR trigger entirely. No overboarding, attendance below 75%, non-independence concerns on audit or compensation committees, or familial relationship issues were identified. The board discloses a skills matrix and all audit committee members are designated financial experts.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

TOM PALMER

Total Comp

$15,625,168

Prior Support

N/A

CEO Tom Palmer's total reported compensation of $15,625,168 is within a reasonable range for the CEO of the world's largest gold producer with an $111 billion market cap, a company that generated record free cash flow of $7.3 billion and a 173% TSR in 2025 alone. The pay program is strongly performance-oriented: the proxy discloses that 89% of CEO pay is 'at risk,' driven by annual incentives tied to cost efficiency and free cash flow, and long-term performance stock awards tied 60% to relative total shareholder return versus peers and 30% to return on capital employed — all meaningful, measurable, multi-year metrics. The company has expanded its clawback provisions to cover cash payments and time-based equity awards including for misconduct, which is a positive governance signal. With strong pay-for-performance alignment — realized pay was 35% below target in the 2022–2024 underperformance period and 27% above target in 2025 when shareholders earned 173% TSR — the incentive structure appears to be working as intended.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$11,716,042

Non-Audit Fees

$1,473,967

Non-audit fees (audit-related fees of $1,294,474 plus tax fees of $165,613 plus other fees of $13,880, totaling approximately $1,473,967) represent about 12.6% of core audit fees of $11,716,042, well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns. EY is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a $111 billion company. Auditor tenure is not disclosed in the proxy, so per policy the tenure trigger does not fire and a FOR vote stands.

Overall Assessment

Newmont's 2026 annual meeting ballot contains three standard proposals: election of twelve directors, ratification of Ernst & Young as auditor, and an advisory say-on-pay vote. All proposals pass the applicable policy screens — the company's outstanding stock performance (+130% over three years, outpacing the S&P 500 (^GSPC — S&P 500) by nearly 70 percentage points), a well-structured performance-based pay program, and a clean auditor fee profile all support FOR votes across the board.

Filing date: March 26, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

25 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

APDAir Products and Chemicals, Inc.
AMEAMETEK, Inc.
BKRBaker Hughes Company
BBarrick Gold Corporation
CARRCarrier Global Corporation
CECelanese Corporation
COPConocoPhillips
CTVACorteva, Inc.
CMICummins Inc.
DDDuPont de Nemours, Inc.
ETNEaton Corporation plc
ECLEcolab Inc.
EMREmerson Electric Co.
EOGEOG Resources, Inc.
FTVFortive Corporation
FCXFreeport McMoRan Inc.
HALHalliburton Company
ITWIllinois Tool Works Inc.
IRIngersoll Rand Inc.
JCIJohnson Controls International plc
OVVOvintiv Inc.
PHParker-Hannifin Corporation
PPGPPG Industries, Inc.
ROKRockwell Automation, Inc.
WABWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation