Sector: Communication
NIQ GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE PLC · Meeting: May 21, 2026
Directors FOR
4
Directors AGAINST
0
Say on Pay
FOR
Auditor
AGAINST
Election of Class I Directors
Ms. Harris Mason has served since June 2021 (approximately 5 years), bringing deep consumer products and marketing leadership experience; NIQ only went public in July 2025 so a meaningful public-company TSR comparison period does not yet exist, and the 24-month new-director exemption does not apply, but with under 6 months of post-IPO trading history no TSR trigger can meaningfully fire; she met the 75% attendance threshold and serves on the audit committee with an independence designation that the board has confirmed.
Mr. Lachman has served since March 2021 and brings extensive consumer products CEO experience (Sovos Brands, Mars, Del Monte); NIQ only completed its IPO in July 2025, so there is insufficient post-IPO trading history to apply the TSR trigger; he met the 75% attendance threshold and holds no more than one additional public board seat (Sauer Brands, a private company chairmanship).
Ms. Simonelli has served since June 2021 and is a seasoned CFO (Anywhere Real Estate, J&J Medical Devices) who qualifies as an audit committee financial expert; the TSR trigger cannot meaningfully fire with under 6 months of post-IPO trading history; she met the 75% attendance threshold and her financial expertise is directly relevant to her audit committee chair role.
Ms. Weiss joined the board in August 2023, which is within the 24-month new-director exemption window (less than 24 months as of the April 2026 filing), so the TSR trigger does not apply to her; her private equity investment background at Advent is relevant to NIQ's stage and ownership structure.
All four Class I director nominees pass the policy screens. NIQ only became a public company in July 2025, so there is less than one year of post-IPO trading history — the TSR trigger, which requires a 3-year public-company track record, cannot meaningfully fire for any director. Gabriela Weiss also independently qualifies for the 24-month new-director exemption. All directors met the 75% attendance threshold. No overboarding, familial relationship, or independence concerns were identified for the four nominees.
CEO
James Peck
Total Comp
$2,623,617
Prior Support
N/A
The CEO's total reported compensation of $2,623,617 for 2025 — consisting of $1,000,000 base salary and $1,522,500 in cash bonus with no equity award expense in the year — is modest relative to the benchmark for a CEO of a $3.4 billion information-services company, and does not exceed the +20% CEO threshold. The company paid out the annual bonus at only 87% of target, reflecting actual below-target operational performance (revenue and EBITDA came in below plan), which demonstrates that the incentive structure is working as intended and penalizing executives when results fall short. The company adopted a meaningful clawback policy in connection with its IPO, equity awards include both time-based and performance-based restricted stock units, and this is the first year the company has been required to hold a say-on-pay vote so there is no prior-year support history that would trigger a no vote.
Auditor
Ernst & Young LLP
Tenure
8 yrs
Audit Fees
$3,136,000
Non-Audit Fees
$5,342,000
Ernst & Young billed $5,342,000 in non-audit fees (Tax Fees of $193,000 plus All Other Fees of $5,149,000) against $3,136,000 in core audit fees, producing a non-audit-to-audit ratio of approximately 170% — well above the 50% threshold that triggers a vote against ratification. The proxy discloses that the large 'All Other Fees' amount consists primarily of due diligence procedures performed on the company's behalf, which is a non-audit advisory service that creates a financial relationship with the auditor large enough to raise independence concerns. EY's tenure of approximately 8 years (since 2018) is well below the 25-year tenure trigger, and there are no known restatements; the sole reason for the AGAINST vote is the outsized non-audit fee ratio.
Meeting held May 21, 2026
Director Elections
| Nominee | % FOR | Votes For | Withheld / Against | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gabriela Weiss | 96.5% | 247.7M | 9.0M | ✓ Elected |
| Racquel Harris Mason | 96.3% | 247.0M | 9.6M | ✓ Elected |
| Todd Lachman | 95.1% | 244.1M | 12.5M | ✓ Elected |
| Charlotte Simonelli | 95.1% | 244.0M | 12.6M | ✓ Elected |
Say on Pay
For 253.5M · Against 3.1M · Abstain 83,174
Auditor Ratification
For 262.2M · Against 3.8M · Abstain 84,234
Other Proposals
Proposal 4
Approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future advisory votes to approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers
Proposal 5
Authorization of the Company and/or any subsidiary of the Company to make market purchases of ordinary shares of the Company
Proposal 6
Determination of the price range at which the Company can re-allot treasury shares (Special Resolution under Irish law)
Proposal 7
Approval of the capital reduction and the creation of distributable reserves (Special Resolution under Irish law)
The 2026 NIQ annual meeting ballot is straightforward: all four director nominees pass policy screens (NIQ has less than one year of public trading history so the TSR trigger cannot fire), the say-on-pay vote passes given modest and below-target CEO pay, and the three Irish law housekeeping proposals (share repurchase, treasury share re-allotment, and capital reduction) are routine. The single contested vote is the auditor ratification, where Ernst & Young's non-audit fees of $5.3 million are 170% of core audit fees — driven primarily by $5.1 million in due diligence services — far exceeding the 50% independence threshold and triggering an AGAINST vote on Proposal 2.
18 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing