INTELLIA THERAPEUTICS INC (NTLA)
Sector: Health Care
2026 Annual Meeting Analysis
INTELLIA THERAPEUTICS INC · Meeting: June 9, 2026
Directors FOR
1
Directors AGAINST
2
Say on Pay
FOR
Auditor
FOR
Director Elections
Election of Three Class I Directors
Against Analysis
Ms. Bhanji has served since April 2022, giving her sufficient tenure to be held accountable for NTLA's severe stock underperformance — the stock has lost about 63% over three years while the company's own peer group (as disclosed in the proxy) roughly broke even, a gap of over 62 percentage points that far exceeds the 20-point trigger threshold; the five-year record offers no relief as NTLA also trails peers over that longer window, so the mitigant does not apply.
Dr. Goodman has served since October 2018 and has been on the board for the entirety of the three-year underperformance period — NTLA's stock has fallen roughly 63% while the company's disclosed peer group was essentially flat over the same period, a gap of more than 62 percentage points that well exceeds our 20-point trigger; the five-year record provides no relief as the underperformance persists over that longer window as well, confirming this is not a transient trough.
For Analysis
Mr. Goff joined the board in June 2024, which is less than 24 months before this meeting, so he is exempt from the stock performance trigger under our policy; he also brings extensive relevant biopharmaceutical commercialization experience that is well-suited to Intellia's stage as it prepares for a potential first commercial launch.
Two of three nominees — Ms. Bhanji and Dr. Goodman — receive AGAINST votes because NTLA's stock has dramatically underperformed its company-disclosed peer group over the past three years (down roughly 63% vs. peers roughly flat, a gap of over 62 percentage points), exceeding the 20-point trigger threshold that applies when a stock has delivered a negative absolute return; the five-year record does not provide the mitigant because underperformance persists over that longer window. Mr. Goff is exempt because he joined within the past 24 months.
Say on Pay
✓ FORCEO
John M. Leonard, M.D.
Total Comp
$5,063,899
Prior Support
71.1%%
The CEO's total pay of approximately $5.1 million for 2025 is reasonable for a biotech chief executive running a $1.6 billion company with two drugs in Phase 3 development, and the pay structure is predominantly variable — a mix of stock options, time-vesting restricted stock units, and performance stock awards tied to three-year relative total shareholder return — meaning the bulk of compensation is genuinely at risk based on future stock and clinical performance. The prior Say on Pay vote cleared the 70% threshold at 71.1%, so no mandatory engagement-failure trigger applies, and the company has documented outreach to shareholders representing 62% of ownership ahead of this filing. While NTLA's stock has materially underperformed peers, the variable equity awards are structured so that executives will only realize meaningful value if the stock recovers and outperforms the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index, which is an appropriate alignment mechanism; the board-level accountability concern is addressed through AGAINST votes on qualifying directors.
Auditor Ratification
✓ FORAuditor
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Tenure
11 yrs
Audit Fees
$1,198,013
Non-Audit Fees
$1,895
The non-audit fees paid to Deloitte ($1,895 for database access) are a tiny fraction of the $1,198,013 in audit fees — well under the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns — and Deloitte has served for approximately 11 years, which is well below the 25-year tenure trigger; as a Big 4 firm auditing a $1.6 billion market-cap company, Deloitte is clearly adequate for the engagement.
Overall Assessment
The 2026 Intellia annual meeting ballot contains three proposals: director elections, auditor ratification, and Say on Pay. The dominant governance issue is severe stock underperformance — NTLA has lost roughly 63% over three years while its own peer group was essentially flat — which drives AGAINST votes on the two Class I nominees with meaningful tenure (Bhanji and Goodman), while the compensation program structure and auditor relationship both pass policy screens and receive FOR votes.
Compensation Peer Group
20 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing