RUBRIK INC CLASS A (RBRK)
Sector: Information Technology
2026 Annual Meeting Analysis
RUBRIK INC CLASS A · Meeting: June 3, 2026
Directors FOR
3
Directors AGAINST
0
Say on Pay
AGAINST
Auditor
FOR
Director Elections
Election of Directors — Class II: Asheem Chandna, Ravi Mhatre, and Arvind Nithrakashyap
Chandna has served since March 2015 and passes the TSR test — Rubrik's 3-year return of +38.8% outperforms the compensation peer group median of -14.6% by +53.4 percentage points, below the 65-percentage-point threshold required to trigger a vote against; no overboarding, independence, attendance, or familial-relationship concerns were identified.
Mhatre has served since January 2014 and passes the TSR test on the same basis as Chandna — the +53.4 percentage-point outperformance versus the peer group median does not trigger a vote against; no overboarding, independence, attendance, or familial-relationship concerns were identified, and his Lightspeed affiliation is disclosed without creating a disqualifying conflict.
Nithrakashyap is a co-founder and Chief Technology Officer who has served as a director since January 2014; as an executive director he is subject to the same TSR test, which does not fire given the peer group outperformance; no overboarding, attendance, or other disqualifying concerns were identified, and his deep technical expertise is directly relevant to Rubrik's business.
All three Class II nominees pass the TSR trigger using the company-disclosed compensation peer group (Rubrik's 3-year return of +38.8% exceeds the peer median of -14.6% by +53.4 percentage points, which is below the 65-percentage-point threshold applicable to companies with strong positive absolute returns). No other policy flags — overboarding, attendance deficiency, independence concerns, or familial relationships — apply to any nominee. Vote FOR all three.
Say on Pay
✗ AGAINSTCEO
Bipul Sinha
Total Comp
$140,018,608
Prior Support
N/A
The CEO's long-term incentive — a single large multi-year performance option reported at approximately $139 million in fiscal year 2025 — is structured around stock price hurdles and continued service rather than rigorous operational or financial performance metrics, which means the incentive pay does not meet the policy standard requiring meaningful performance conditions. For non-CEO named executive officers, the RSU grants vest based entirely on continued service with no explicit performance conditions, meaning a large portion of what is labeled variable compensation is effectively guaranteed pay tied only to staying at the company. While Rubrik's stock performance relative to its compensation peers is strong (outperforming the peer median by over 53 percentage points over three years), the policy requires that incentive compensation be genuinely contingent on outcomes beyond time-based vesting — and that standard is not met here for either the CEO or the other executives.
Auditor Ratification
✓ FORAuditor
KPMG LLP
Tenure
8 yrs
Audit Fees
$4,802,000
Non-Audit Fees
$947,263
Non-audit fees (tax fees of $792,000, audit-related fees of $152,263, and other fees of $3,000, totaling approximately $947,263) represent about 19.7% of core audit fees of $4,802,000 — well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns. KPMG has audited Rubrik since 2018 (approximately 8 years), far below the 25-year tenure threshold. KPMG is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of Rubrik's size, and no material financial restatements were identified.
Overall Assessment
Rubrik's 2026 annual meeting presents three standard proposals plus a say-on-frequency advisory vote. The director slate receives FOR votes for all three nominees — Rubrik's stock has significantly outperformed its compensation peer group over three years, clearing the TSR threshold — and KPMG is ratified without concern given modest non-audit fees and a short tenure. The say-on-pay vote receives an AGAINST determination primarily because the CEO's multi-year performance option and the non-CEO RSU awards lack rigorous, ongoing operational performance conditions, meaning a substantial portion of what is classified as variable pay is effectively guaranteed through time-based vesting alone.
Compensation Peer Group
20 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing