AVITA MEDICAL INC (RCEL)

Sector: Health Care

    Home/Companies/RCEL/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

AVITA MEDICAL INC · Meeting: June 3, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

2

Directors AGAINST

5

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

2 FOR/5 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Cary VanceTSR underperformance trigger: 3yr RCEL return -68.3% vs IHI -6.0%, gap of -62.3pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director joined April 2023, tenure overlaps underperformance period; 5yr underperformance also severe (-77.3% vs IHI), no mitigant applies

Mr. Vance has served as a director since April 2023, giving him meaningful tenure during AVITA's severe stock decline of -68.3% over three years, which trails the medical device benchmark (IHI — iShares US Medical Devices ETF) by 62.3 percentage points — far exceeding the 30-point threshold our policy requires to trigger a vote against; the five-year return is even worse at -77.3%, so the longer track record provides no mitigating comfort.

✗ AGAINST
Professor Suzanne CroweTSR underperformance trigger: 3yr RCEL return -68.3% vs IHI -6.0%, gap of -62.3pp exceeds 30pp threshold; long-tenured director since January 2016, full overlap with underperformance period; 5yr underperformance equally severe, no mitigant applies

Professor Crowe has served on the board since 2016, meaning she was fully in place during the company's steep three-year stock decline of 68.3%, which is 62.3 percentage points worse than the medical device benchmark (IHI — iShares US Medical Devices ETF); the five-year return of -77.3% shows this is not a recent blip but a sustained pattern, so no mitigating adjustment applies.

✗ AGAINST
Jeremy Curnock CookTSR underperformance trigger: 3yr RCEL return -68.3% vs IHI -6.0%, gap of -62.3pp exceeds 30pp threshold; director since October 2012, full overlap with underperformance period; 5yr underperformance equally severe, no mitigant applies

Mr. Curnock Cook has been a director since 2012, giving him the longest tenure on the board during AVITA's three-year stock loss of 68.3%, which is 62.3 percentage points below the medical device benchmark (IHI — iShares US Medical Devices ETF); the five-year return of -77.3% confirms sustained underperformance, leaving no basis for a mitigating adjustment.

✗ AGAINST
Robert McNamaraTSR underperformance trigger: 3yr RCEL return -68.3% vs IHI -6.0%, gap of -62.3pp exceeds 30pp threshold; director since April 2023, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period; 5yr data unavailable for his tenure but 3yr trigger clearly fires

Mr. McNamara joined the board in April 2023, so his entire tenure coincides with the period of severe stock underperformance; AVITA's three-year return of -68.3% is 62.3 percentage points worse than the medical device benchmark (IHI — iShares US Medical Devices ETF), far exceeding the 30-point trigger, and the five-year return of -77.3% provides no long-term mitigant.

✗ AGAINST
Jan Stern ReedTSR underperformance trigger: 3yr RCEL return -68.3% vs IHI -6.0%, gap of -62.3pp exceeds 30pp threshold; director since July 2021, full overlap with 3yr underperformance period; 5yr underperformance equally severe, no mitigant applies

Ms. Reed has served since July 2021, meaning her tenure fully covers the three-year measurement window during which AVITA's stock fell 68.3% against a medical device benchmark (IHI — iShares US Medical Devices ETF) that fell only 6.0%, a gap of 62.3 percentage points; the five-year return of -77.3% confirms this is a sustained problem rather than a transient dip.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Dr. Michael Tarnoffnew director exemption: joined August 2025, less than 24 months ago

Dr. Tarnoff was appointed to the board in August 2025 — less than 24 months before the meeting — so our policy exempts him from the stock performance trigger, giving him reasonable time to contribute before being held accountable for prior-period results.

✓ FOR
Joseph Woodynew director exemption: joined January 2026, less than 24 months ago

Mr. Woody joined the board in January 2026 — well under 24 months ago — so our policy exempts him from the stock performance trigger, as he has had virtually no time to influence the company's performance trajectory.

Five of seven director nominees — all those with tenure exceeding 24 months — receive an AGAINST vote because AVITA's three-year stock return of -68.3% trails the medical device benchmark (IHI — iShares US Medical Devices ETF) by 62.3 percentage points, far above the 30-point trigger for companies with negative absolute returns; the five-year return of -77.3% provides no mitigating relief. The two newest directors, Dr. Tarnoff and Mr. Woody, are exempt from the trigger under the policy's 24-month new-director grace period.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Cary Vance

Total Comp

$278,053

Prior Support

77%%

Cary Vance served as Interim CEO only from October 16, 2025, and his total compensation of $278,053 — composed of $137,475 in salary and a $140,000 guaranteed bonus — is very modest and well below any reasonable benchmark for a CEO of even a small medical device company, reflecting his partial-year, interim status. The prior year say-on-pay vote passed with approximately 77% support, above the 70% threshold that would require visible changes, and the compensation committee made no structural changes in response — which is appropriate given the strong result. While the company's stock performance has been deeply negative, the overall pay program at this compensation level does not raise pay-for-performance concerns, and the company maintains a compliant Dodd-Frank clawback policy.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Grant Thornton LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$803,294

Non-Audit Fees

$128,938

Tax fees (the only non-audit fees) were $128,938 against audit fees of $803,294, making the non-audit ratio approximately 16% — well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns; auditor tenure is not explicitly disclosed in the proxy so no tenure trigger applies; Grant Thornton is a large national firm appropriate for a company of AVITA's size and complexity.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 AVITA Medical annual meeting features 15 proposals, with the most significant governance concern being the company's severe stock underperformance — a three-year return of -68.3% that trails the medical device benchmark (IHI — iShares US Medical Devices ETF) by 62.3 percentage points — which triggers AGAINST votes for five of seven director nominees who have been on the board long enough to be accountable; the say-on-pay vote is straightforward given the CEO's very modest partial-year interim compensation of $278,053, and the auditor ratification passes cleanly with a low non-audit fee ratio of approximately 16%.

Filing date: April 22, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence