VIRIDIAN THERAPEUTICS ORS INC (VRDN)

Sector: Health Care

    Home/Companies/VRDN/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

VIRIDIAN THERAPEUTICS ORS INC · Meeting: June 2, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

0

Directors AGAINST

2

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Class II Directors

/2 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Tomas KiselakTSR underperformance vs XBI: -113.3pp gap exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute 3-year TSR; 5-year TSR mitigant does not save — 5-year price return is -0.5% (negative), and the gap vs XBI over 5 years also exceeds the applicable threshold; tenure since October 2020 fully overlaps underperformance period; overboarding check: holds 4+ public company board seats (VRDN, Apogee Therapeutics, Spyre Therapeutics, Zenas BioPharma) triggering the 4-board overboarding rule

Mr. Kiselak has served on the board since October 2020, meaning his entire tenure coincides with a period where Viridian's stock has fallen roughly 43% over three years while the XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF gained about 70%, a gap of approximately 113 percentage points that far exceeds the 30-point threshold required to trigger an against vote; additionally, he currently sits on at least four public company boards (Viridian, Apogee Therapeutics, Spyre Therapeutics, and Zenas BioPharma), triggering the overboarding rule independently.

✗ AGAINST
Jennifer K. MosesTSR underperformance vs XBI: -113.3pp gap exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute 3-year TSR; 5-year TSR mitigant does not save — 5-year price return is -0.5% (negative), and the gap vs XBI over 5 years also exceeds the applicable threshold; tenure since July 2021 fully overlaps underperformance period

Ms. Moses has served on the board since July 2021, meaning her tenure fully overlaps with a period where Viridian's stock declined roughly 43% over three years while the XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF rose about 70%, a gap of approximately 113 percentage points that far exceeds the 30-point threshold; her strong financial qualifications and audit expertise are noted, but the TSR underperformance trigger applies regardless of individual director skills.

For Analysis

Both Class II director nominees — Tomas Kiselak (Chairman, since October 2020) and Jennifer Moses (since July 2021) — are subject to an against vote due to severe stock underperformance during their tenures: Viridian's 3-year price return of -43% trails the XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF by approximately 113 percentage points, well above the 30-point trigger for companies with negative absolute returns; the 5-year return of -0.5% does not provide relief as the long-term gap also exceeds the applicable threshold; Mr. Kiselak additionally triggers the overboarding rule by serving on four or more public company boards.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

Stephen Mahoney

Total Comp

$6,776,249

Prior Support

78%%

Pay-for-performance misalignment: above-benchmark variable pay awarded while stock underperformed XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF by approximately 113 percentage points over 3 yearsCash bonus paid at 150% of target despite negative shareholder returns over the measurement periodPrior Say on Pay support of 78% — above 70% threshold so no automatic no vote on that basis alone, but combined with TSR misalignment supports against

Viridian's stock fell roughly 43% over the past three years while the XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF gained about 70%, a gap of approximately 113 percentage points, meaning shareholders experienced significant losses while biotech peers thrived; despite this, executives received annual cash bonuses at 150% of target — above the benchmark level — and large equity grants valued at over $6.4 million for the CEO alone, creating a clear disconnect between what shareholders experienced and what executives were paid; while the company achieved meaningful pipeline milestones (BLA submission, enrollment completions) and the pay mix is appropriately variable at roughly 91% at-risk for the CEO, the above-benchmark incentive payouts in the face of severe stock underperformance relative to the XBI benchmark fail the pay-for-performance alignment check under our policy.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

KPMG LLP

Tenure

9 yrs

Audit Fees

$1,789,000

Non-Audit Fees

$0

KPMG has served as Viridian's auditor since 2017 (approximately 9 years), well below the 25-year tenure threshold; all fees paid were pure audit fees with zero non-audit, audit-related, tax, or other fees billed in 2025, so the non-audit fee ratio is 0% — far below the 50% threshold; KPMG is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a $1.5 billion market cap company, and no material restatements were identified.

Overall Assessment

This ballot presents four proposals at Viridian's 2026 annual meeting; we vote against both Class II director nominees due to severe stock underperformance relative to the XBI — SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (a gap of approximately 113 percentage points over three years) and, in Mr. Kiselak's case, overboarding across four public company boards, and we vote against the Say on Pay proposal due to above-target bonus payouts and large equity grants awarded during a period of deeply negative shareholder returns relative to biotech peers; we support auditor ratification given KPMG's clean fee structure (zero non-audit fees) and appropriate tenure.

Filing date: April 17, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence