DANA INCORPORATED INC (DAN)
Sector: Consumer Discretionary
2026 Annual Meeting Analysis
DANA INCORPORATED INC · Meeting: April 22, 2026
Directors FOR
8
Directors AGAINST
0
Say on Pay
FOR
Auditor
FOR
Director Elections
Election of Directors
Director since 2026, newly appointed and therefore exempt from the TSR trigger under the 24-month new-director exemption; brings relevant automotive industry executive experience.
Director since 2022; Dana's 3-year TSR of +126% is strongly positive and outperforms the compensation peer group TSR benchmark, so no TSR trigger fires; brings deep automotive industry executive experience.
Director since 2019; Dana's strong 3-year TSR outperforms peers, so no TSR trigger fires; brings technology and executive leadership experience relevant to Dana's transformation.
Director since 2024, within the 24-month new-director exemption window; brings legal and general counsel executive experience at a large public company.
Director since 2018; Dana's strong 3-year TSR outperforms peers so no TSR trigger fires; brings CFO and senior executive experience at Deere & Company and qualifies as an audit committee financial expert.
Executive director and current Chairman/CEO since 2014; Dana's 3-year TSR of +126% strongly outperforms the peer group, so no TSR trigger fires; brings extensive automotive CEO and CFO experience.
Director since 2025, within the 24-month new-director exemption window; brings CFO and finance executive experience and qualifies as an audit committee financial expert.
Director since 2018; Dana's strong 3-year TSR outperforms peers so no TSR trigger fires; brings automotive electrification and corporate strategy experience relevant to Dana's business.
All eight nominees pass policy screens. Dana's 3-year total shareholder return of +126% is strongly positive and materially outperforms the compensation peer group, so the TSR underperformance trigger does not fire for any director. Three nominees (Foster, LaFreniere, Nelligan) joined within the past 24 months and are exempt from the TSR trigger regardless. No overboarding, attendance, independence, or familial relationship concerns were identified. Vote FOR all eight nominees.
Say on Pay
✓ FORCEO
R. Bruce McDonald
Total Comp
$5,609,922
Prior Support
79%%
CEO total compensation of approximately $5.6 million is reasonable for an interim CEO at a ~$3.4 billion market cap industrial company, consisting primarily of a $1.3 million salary and $4.1 million in stock awards (restricted stock units only, consistent with his interim appointment terms). The prior Say on Pay vote received 79% support, comfortably above the 70% threshold requiring a response. The pay program for other executives is well-structured: at least half of long-term incentive pay is delivered through performance stock awards tied to measurable financial metrics (return on invested capital, free cash flow, and relative total shareholder return) over a three-year period, and all financial performance targets for 2025 were exceeded at maximum levels, which is consistent with Dana's stock price rising from $11.56 to $23.76 during the year — a strong alignment of pay and performance. The company maintains a robust clawback policy, prohibits hedging and pledging, and has implemented double-trigger change-in-control vesting, all of which reflect sound governance practices.
Auditor Ratification
✓ FORAuditor
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Tenure
N/A
Audit Fees
$10,000,000
Non-Audit Fees
$3,500,000
Non-audit fees (audit-related fees of $3.3M plus tax and other fees of $0.2M = $3.5M) represent approximately 35% of core audit fees ($10.0M), which is well below the 50% threshold that would trigger a concern about auditor independence. PwC is a Big 4 firm appropriate for Dana's size and complexity. Auditor tenure is not explicitly disclosed in the proxy, so the tenure trigger cannot fire per policy. No material financial restatements are noted. Vote FOR ratification.
Stockholder Proposals
1 proposal submitted by shareholders
Proposal 4
Shareholder Proposal for Approval of Independent Board Chairman
John Chevedden is a well-known individual governance activist whose proposals are generally taken seriously on the merits. However, this proposal received only 25.6% shareholder support in 2025 and similarly failed in 2023, placing it well below the threshold where the policy would signal a strong shareholder concern requiring a FOR vote. More importantly, the company has already announced that the Chairman and CEO roles will be separated effective July 1, 2026 — meaning the core governance improvement the proposal seeks is already being implemented before shareholders even vote. Requiring a permanent, inflexible policy on top of a separation that is already happening adds little practical benefit while removing the board's flexibility to adapt its leadership structure in the future. Vote AGAINST.
Overall Assessment
Dana's 2026 annual meeting presents a four-proposal ballot with no major governance red flags. The company has delivered strong stock price performance over the past three years, the CEO pay program is reasonably structured, auditor fees are within acceptable bounds, and the one shareholder proposal — requesting a permanent independent board chairman — is effectively moot because the company is already separating the Chairman and CEO roles effective July 1, 2026. All four standard proposals are recommended FOR, AGAINST, FOR, and AGAINST respectively.