Proxyanalyst LogoProxyanalyst
CompaniesSpecial SituationsExplorerAbout
Terms and Conditions & Privacy PolicyHoryzen LLCSitemap

IMMERSION CORP (IMMR)

Sector: Information Technology

ExecutivesDirectorsTrendsAnnual MeetingProxy Filings
    Home/Companies/IMMR/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

IMMERSION CORP · Meeting: April 6, 2026

Policy v1.2medium confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

1

Directors AGAINST

4

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Five Directors

1 FOR/4 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
William C. Martin⚑ TSR underperformance ETF fallback: IMMR 3yr return -6.6% vs XLK +98.3%, gap of -104.9pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5yr return -29.0% vs XLK multi-year outperformance does not mitigate; director since 2019, full tenure overlap

Mr. Martin has served since 2019, giving him full tenure overlap with Immersion's severe underperformance versus the technology sector ETF XLK — the stock lost 6.6% over three years while XLK gained 98.3%, a gap of 104.9 percentage points that far exceeds the 30-point trigger threshold for companies with negative absolute returns; the five-year record (-29.0% vs. XLK) does not provide a mitigating longer-term track record, so the Against vote stands.

✗ AGAINST
Elias Nader⚑ TSR underperformance ETF fallback: IMMR 3yr return -6.6% vs XLK +98.3%, gap of -104.9pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5yr check does not mitigate; director since 2022, tenure >24 months, meaningful overlap with underperformance period

Mr. Nader joined in 2022, giving him more than 24 months of tenure and meaningful overlap with the underperformance period; the stock's 3-year loss of 6.6% against XLK's gain of 98.3% (a gap of 104.9 percentage points) far exceeds the 30-point threshold, and the five-year return of -29.0% confirms this is not a recent anomaly within an otherwise solid track record.

✗ AGAINST
Eric Singer⚑ TSR underperformance ETF fallback: IMMR 3yr return -6.6% vs XLK +98.3%, gap of -104.9pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5yr check does not mitigate; director since 2020, CEO/executive director subject to same TSR trigger; full tenure overlap

Mr. Singer has served since 2020 as a director and as CEO since January 2023, giving him full tenure overlap with the underperformance; as an executive director he is subject to the same TSR trigger as all other directors, and the 104.9-percentage-point gap between Immersion's 3-year return and XLK far exceeds the policy threshold — this director vote is independent of the Say on Pay evaluation.

✗ AGAINST
Frederick Wasch⚑ TSR underperformance ETF fallback: IMMR 3yr return -6.6% vs XLK +98.3%, gap of -104.9pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5yr check does not mitigate; director since 2021, full tenure overlap

Mr. Wasch has served since 2021, giving him full tenure overlap with Immersion's sustained underperformance against XLK; the 104.9-percentage-point 3-year gap and the five-year return of -29.0% against XLK's strong multi-year gains confirm that the underperformance is not a short-term blip, and no mitigating 5-year track record exists.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Emily S. Hoffman

Ms. Hoffman joined the board in 2023, and while she has now been a director for more than 24 months, her tenure began during an already-established period of underperformance; under the policy, directors who joined after underperformance was already established receive mitigating context, and given that her tenure covers less than the full 3-year measurement window and the underperformance predates her appointment, a For vote is appropriate.

Four of the five director nominees — Martin (since 2019), Nader (since 2022), Singer (since 2020), and Wasch (since 2021) — are voted Against due to Immersion's severe and sustained underperformance against the technology sector benchmark XLK, with the stock losing 6.6% over three years while XLK gained 98.3%, a gap of 104.9 percentage points that far exceeds the 30-point policy threshold. Emily Hoffman, who joined in 2023 after underperformance was already established and whose tenure does not cover the full measurement window, receives a For vote.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

Eric Singer

Total Comp

$12,293,260

Prior Support

87.2%%

⚑ CEO total compensation $12.29M likely exceeds benchmark for small-cap technology CEO by more than 20%⚑ pay for performance misalignment: stock down 6.6% over 3 years and 15.5% over 1 year while variable pay is substantially above benchmark⚑ financial restatement: company restated quarterly financials for multiple periods in FY2025, though company concluded no clawback was required⚑ equity grants appear front loaded with large single awards covering multi year periods

CEO Eric Singer received total compensation of $12.29 million at a company with a market cap of only $211 million — this is extremely high relative to the expected pay range for a small-cap technology CEO, almost certainly exceeding the 20% above-benchmark threshold that triggers a No vote on CEO pay. The pay-for-performance alignment check also fails: Immersion's stock has declined 6.6% over three years and 15.5% over the past year while the technology sector ETF XLK gained 98.3%, yet Singer received $5.89 million in bonuses and $4.96 million in stock awards during the most recent fiscal year alone; this combination of above-benchmark incentive pay alongside severe stock underperformance is precisely the misalignment the policy is designed to flag. The company also disclosed a restatement of multiple quarterly financial periods during FY2025, which — even though the board concluded no excess compensation was paid — adds further governance concern about the reliability of the performance metrics on which bonuses were based.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

BDO USA, P.C.

Tenure

1 yrs

Audit Fees

$227,700

Non-Audit Fees

$0

BDO was appointed in July 2024 and has served for approximately one year, well below the 25-year tenure threshold; non-audit fees are zero, giving a non-audit ratio of 0% against the 50% threshold; BDO is a large national firm appropriate for a company of Immersion's size; and there are no material restatement concerns attributable to BDO's work, so all policy screens pass.

Actual Vote Results

Meeting held April 6, 2026

View 8-K ↗

Director Elections

Nominee% FORVotes ForWithheld / AgainstResult
Emily S. Hoffman
91.5%
14.0M1.3M✓ Elected
Eric Singer
91.0%
13.9M1.4M✓ Elected
Frederick Wasch
87.8%
13.4M1.9M✓ Elected
William Martin
87.1%
13.3M2.0M✓ Elected
Elias Nader
81.2%
12.4M2.9M✓ Elected

Broker non-votes: 9.2M

Say on Pay

56.6%

For 8.7M · Against 6.6M · Abstain 53,856

✓ Passed

Auditor Ratification

95.2%

For 23.3M · Against 1.2M · Abstain 25,371

✓ Passed

Overall Assessment

Immersion's 2026 annual meeting ballot features significant governance concerns: four of five director nominees are voted Against due to Immersion's catastrophic underperformance against the technology sector benchmark XLK (a 104.9-percentage-point gap over three years), and the Say on Pay vote is Against due to CEO compensation of $12.29 million that appears highly excessive for a $211 million market-cap company with a declining stock price. The auditor ratification of BDO — a newly appointed firm with clean fee ratios — passes without issue, and incoming director Emily Hoffman receives a For vote as a newer member who joined after underperformance was already established.

Filing date: March 12, 2026·Policy v1.2·medium confidence