QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP (NX)

Sector: Industrials

    Home/Companies/NX/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP · Meeting: February 26, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

3

Directors AGAINST

5

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

3 FOR/5 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Bradley E. Hughes3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group: NX -7.8% absolute, peers +37.2% median, gap -45.0pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR5-year TSR check: NX -27.7% vs peer median +5.7%, gap -33.4pp exceeds 20pp threshold — no mitigant

Mr. Hughes has served since 2022, giving him meaningful tenure overlap with the 3-year underperformance period; NX's stock fell 7.8% over three years while the company's own peer group gained 37.2% on average, a gap of 45 percentage points that far exceeds the 20-point trigger for directors overseeing a company with negative absolute returns, and the 5-year record (NX -27.7% vs peers +5.7%) confirms this is not a transient dip.

✗ AGAINST
Jason D. Lippert3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group: NX -7.8% absolute, peers +37.2% median, gap -45.0pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR5-year TSR check: NX -27.7% vs peer median +5.7%, gap -33.4pp exceeds 20pp threshold — no mitigantCEO of LCI Industries — sitting CEO holding outside board seat; policy flags sitting CEOs with 2+ outside public seats, but Lippert appears to hold only this one outside seat so overboarding rule does not fire independently

Mr. Lippert has served since 2021, giving him full overlap with the 3-year underperformance period; NX's stock fell 7.8% over three years while the company's own peers gained 37.2% on average, a 45-point gap that triggers the policy threshold, and the 5-year record (NX -27.7% vs peers +5.7%) confirms sustained underperformance with no mitigating improvement in the longer window.

✗ AGAINST
Donald R. Maier3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group: NX -7.8% absolute, peers +37.2% median, gap -45.0pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR5-year TSR check: NX -27.7% vs peer median +5.7%, gap -33.4pp exceeds 20pp threshold — no mitigant

Mr. Maier has served since 2019, giving him full overlap with the 3-year underperformance period; NX's stock fell 7.8% over three years while the company's own peers gained 37.2% on average, a 45-point gap well above the 20-point trigger, and the 5-year record (NX -27.7% vs peers +5.7%) shows the underperformance is sustained rather than transient.

✗ AGAINST
William E. Waltz, Jr.3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group: NX -7.8% absolute, peers +37.2% median, gap -45.0pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR5-year TSR check: NX -27.7% vs peer median +5.7%, gap -33.4pp exceeds 20pp threshold — no mitigant

Mr. Waltz has served since 2020, giving him full overlap with the 3-year underperformance period; NX's stock fell 7.8% over three years while the company's own peers gained 37.2% on average, a 45-point gap well above the 20-point trigger, and the 5-year record (NX -27.7% vs peers +5.7%) confirms sustained underperformance with no 5-year mitigant.

✗ AGAINST
George L. Wilson3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group: NX -7.8% absolute, peers +37.2% median, gap -45.0pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR5-year TSR check: NX -27.7% vs peer median +5.7%, gap -33.4pp exceeds 20pp threshold — no mitigantExecutive director (CEO) subject to same TSR trigger as all other directors

Mr. Wilson has served as CEO and director since 2020 and bears the most direct accountability for the company's performance; NX's stock fell 7.8% over three years while the company's own peers gained 37.2% on average, a 45-point gap well above the 20-point trigger for negative absolute returns, and the 5-year record (NX -27.7% vs peers +5.7%) shows no recovery — this vote against him as a director is separate from and independent of the say-on-pay vote.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Mary K. Lawler

Ms. Lawler was appointed to the board effective November 1, 2024, which is less than 24 months before the meeting date of February 26, 2026; under policy, directors who joined within the past 24 months are exempt from the TSR underperformance trigger.

✓ FOR
Manish H. Shah

Mr. Shah joined the board in 2024; while the proxy does not specify an exact month, the filing indicates he was newly added in fiscal 2024 and his tenure appears to be within or near the 24-month exemption window — given the ambiguity, the policy directs us to flag but not automatically vote against directors whose tenure covers less than half the underperformance period, and Shah's short tenure means he cannot reasonably be held accountable for pre-existing underperformance.

✓ FOR
Amit Singhi

Mr. Singhi joined the board in 2024; like Shah, his tenure is recent and within or near the 24-month new-director exemption, so he cannot reasonably be held accountable for underperformance that predates his appointment.

Five of the eight director nominees are recommended AGAINST due to significant stock underperformance during their tenures: NX's 3-year total return of -7.8% trails its own compensation peer group median of +37.2% by 45 percentage points, well above the 20-point policy threshold for companies with negative absolute returns, and the 5-year record (-27.7% vs peers +5.7%) confirms the underperformance is sustained. Two newer directors (Shah and Singhi, both joining in 2024) are recommended FOR given their limited tenure. Ms. Lawler is recommended FOR as she joined within the 24-month new-director exemption window.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

George L. Wilson

Total Comp

$3,635,424

Prior Support

88.19%%

The CEO's total compensation of $3,635,424 is within a reasonable range for a CEO at an $812M market-cap industrial company, and the pay mix is heavily weighted toward variable pay — approximately 65% of total compensation is performance-based, well above the 50–60% policy threshold. Critically, the incentive pay structure actually worked as intended this year: the annual cash bonus paid out at only 71% of target reflecting weak financial results, and both the 3-year performance stock awards and performance-based stock units paid out at 0% due to failure to meet TSR and return-on-net-assets targets, meaning executives shared meaningfully in the pain that shareholders experienced. The company has a meaningful clawback policy compliant with NYSE rules, received strong prior-year support of 88.19%, and the compensation committee made no adjustments to performance goals that would have shielded executives from the consequences of underperformance.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

KPMG LLP

Tenure

0 yrs

Audit Fees

N/A

Non-Audit Fees

N/A

newly appointed auditor replacing Grant Thornton; material weakness in internal controls disclosed for fiscal 2024 and 2025 under prior auditorno fee data disclosed for KPMG as it is a new engagement

KPMG LLP was only just appointed in January 2026 as a replacement for Grant Thornton, so it has essentially zero tenure with the company and no fee history to evaluate — the tenure and fee-ratio triggers cannot fire on a brand-new engagement. KPMG is a Big 4 firm fully appropriate for a company of Quanex's size ($812M market cap), and the change in auditor was driven by the audit committee's decision to upgrade oversight following a material weakness in internal controls identified under Grant Thornton; voting FOR supports the board's corrective action.

Overall Assessment

This ballot contains three standard proposals: director elections, auditor ratification, and say-on-pay. Five of the eight director nominees are recommended AGAINST due to sustained stock underperformance — NX's shares declined 7.8% over three years while its own peers gained 37.2% on average, a gap that triggers the policy threshold, and the 5-year record offers no mitigating recovery. The say-on-pay vote is recommended FOR because incentive pay actually aligned with shareholder experience this year (bonuses below target, long-term performance awards paying zero), and the newly appointed auditor KPMG LLP is recommended FOR as a sound governance upgrade replacing the prior auditor under whose watch material control weaknesses were identified.

Filing date: January 28, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

18 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

AAONAAON Inc.
AMWDAmerican Woodmark Corp.
APOGApogee Enterprises Inc.
AWIArmstrong World Industries
CSWICSW Industrials Inc.
FBINFortune Brands
ROCKGibraltar Industries Inc.
GFFGriffon Industries Inc.
HIHillenbrand
IIINInsteel Industries Inc.
JELDJELD-WEN Holding
KMTKennametal
FSTRL.B. Foster Company
MBCMasterBrand
MWAMueller Water Products, Inc.
REZIResideo Technologies
SSDSimpson Manufacturing Inc.
TREXTrex Company, Inc.