RIDGEPOST CAPITAL INC CLASS A (RPC)

Sector: Financials

    Home/Companies/RPC/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

RIDGEPOST CAPITAL INC CLASS A · Meeting: June 18, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

1

Directors AGAINST

2

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Three Class II Directors

1 FOR/2 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
David M. McCoyTSR underperformance trigger: 3-year price return -17.6% vs XLF +65.6%, gap of -83.2pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5-year price return -30.4% vs XLF (5-year context unavailable to confirm mitigant, absolute TSR negative at both horizons — no 5-year mitigant applies)

Mr. McCoy has served as a director since 2023, which is more than 24 months ago, meaning he is subject to the stock performance test. RPC's stock has fallen approximately 17.6% over the past three years while the financial services sector benchmark (XLF) gained about 65.6% — a gap of roughly 83 percentage points, which far exceeds the 30-percentage-point trigger threshold that applies when a company's stock has declined in absolute terms. The 5-year track record (stock down ~30.4%) does not provide a mitigating longer-term record of adequate performance, so the trigger is confirmed and a vote against is warranted.

✗ AGAINST
Robert B. Stewart, Jr.TSR underperformance trigger: director since 2021 (tenure fully overlaps underperformance period); 3-year price return -17.6% vs XLF +65.6%, gap of -83.2pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5-year absolute TSR also negative (-30.4%), no 5-year mitigant applies

Mr. Stewart has been on the board since 2021, so his tenure fully covers the three-year underperformance period. Over that time RPC's stock lost roughly 17.6% while the financial services sector benchmark (XLF) gained about 65.6%, a gap of approximately 83 percentage points — well above the 30-percentage-point threshold that applies when the stock's absolute return is negative. Checking the five-year record does not help: the stock is also down about 30.4% over five years, so there is no longer-term track record of adequate performance to offset the recent underperformance, and the against vote stands.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Tracey Benford

Ms. Benford joined the board in April 2024, which is within the 24-month new-director exemption window, so she is exempt from the stock performance trigger; she brings strong relevant financial services credentials from a 25-year career at Goldman Sachs, serves as lead independent director, and the proxy discloses no overboarding, attendance, or independence concerns.

Three Class II directors are up for election to three-year terms. Tracey Benford receives a FOR vote as a recently appointed director within the 24-month new-director exemption. David McCoy and Robert Stewart both receive AGAINST votes because RPC's stock has significantly underperformed the financial services sector benchmark (XLF) over the periods covered by their tenures, with no mitigating five-year track record, and no other overriding positive governance factors.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

Luke A. Sarsfield III

Total Comp

$5,196,158

Prior Support

N/A

Pay-for-performance misalignment: variable pay above benchmark while TSR underperforms XLF by ~83pp over 3 yearsCEO bonus ($1,800,000) exceeded target ($1,500,000) — 20% above target — while stock declined 17.6% over 3 years and 26.9% over 1 yearCEO carried interest award ($5,700,000 estimated future value) exceeded target ($3,500,000) by 63% with no apparent performance-condition linkage to stock priceIncentive plan is largely discretionary with no clear, measurable performance conditions tying payout levels to shareholder outcomes

The company's stock has lost roughly 17.6% over the past three years while the financial services sector benchmark (XLF) gained about 65.6% — a gap of approximately 83 percentage points — meaning shareholders have experienced significant relative and absolute losses. Despite this, the CEO received a cash bonus of $1.8 million, which is 20% above his $1.5 million target, and a carried interest award with an estimated future value of $5.7 million against a $3.5 million target — a 63% premium over target — with the compensation discussion making clear that these amounts were set through a largely discretionary process with no formulaic linkage to stock performance or shareholder returns. This combination of above-target incentive pay delivered through a discretionary process while shareholders have suffered meaningful losses represents a failure of pay-for-performance alignment under our policy, and warrants a vote against.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

KPMG LLP

Tenure

9 yrs

Audit Fees

$3,870,000

Non-Audit Fees

$44,176

KPMG's non-audit fees of $44,176 represent only about 1.1% of audit fees of $3,870,000, well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns; KPMG has served since 2017 (approximately 9 years), which is well below the 25-year tenure threshold; KPMG is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of RPC's size; and no material financial restatements are disclosed.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 Ridgepost Capital annual meeting presents four standard proposals. The auditor ratification is straightforward and earns a FOR vote, while the Say on Pay vote receives an AGAINST due to above-target incentive pay for the CEO during a period of severe stock underperformance relative to the financial services sector. Of the three director nominees, Tracey Benford receives a FOR vote as a recently appointed director, but David McCoy and Robert Stewart both receive AGAINST votes because RPC's stock has dramatically underperformed the XLF financial services benchmark during their tenures with no mitigating longer-term track record.

Filing date: April 30, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence