Proxyanalyst LogoProxyanalyst
CompaniesSpecial SituationsExplorerAbout
Terms and Conditions & Privacy PolicySitemap

RUMBLE INC CLASS A (RUM)

Sector: Communication

ExecutivesDirectorsTrendsAnnual MeetingProxy Filings
    Home/Companies/RUM/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

RUMBLE INC CLASS A · Meeting: June 11, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

3

Directors AGAINST

3

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

3 FOR/3 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Chris Pavlovski⚑ TSR trigger: 3-year price return -26.5% vs XLC +107.3%, gap of -133.8pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director has served since September 2022 (>24 months tenure overlap); 5-year return -33.4% vs XLC — underperformance persists over 5-year window, no mitigation applies; familial/conflicts not applicable but note combined CEO/Chairman role and 83% voting control

Pavlovski has served as a director since September 2022, giving him full tenure overlap with Rumble's severe stock underperformance — the stock fell 26.5% over three years while the XLC communication services ETF rose 107.3%, a gap of 133.8 percentage points that far exceeds the 30-point threshold required to trigger a vote against; the five-year record is equally poor (-33.4% vs. the ETF), so no mitigation applies.

✗ AGAINST
Paul Cappuccio⚑ TSR trigger: 3-year price return -26.5% vs XLC +107.3%, gap of -133.8pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director has served since September 2022 (>24 months tenure overlap); 5-year underperformance persists, no mitigation applies

Cappuccio has served since September 2022 and has full tenure overlap with Rumble's significant stock decline; over three years the stock underperformed the XLC ETF by 133.8 percentage points, well beyond the 30-point trigger threshold, and the five-year return is similarly poor, so no 5-year mitigation applies.

✗ AGAINST
Ryan Milnes⚑ TSR trigger: 3-year price return -26.5% vs XLC +107.3%, gap of -133.8pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director has served since September 2022 (>24 months tenure overlap); 5-year underperformance persists, no mitigation applies; Milnes is CEO of Cosmic Development, which has a related-party service agreement with Rumble — independence concern

Milnes has served since September 2022 with full tenure overlap with Rumble's severe stock underperformance (133.8 percentage points below the XLC ETF over three years, far exceeding the 30-point threshold), and the five-year record provides no mitigation; additionally, Milnes is CEO of Cosmic Development, a company that receives approximately $3.3 million annually in service fees from Rumble, which is a significant related-party relationship that raises independence concerns even though the board classifies him as non-independent.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Katie Biber⚑ Joined January 2025 — within 24-month new-director exemption

Biber joined the board in January 2025, which is within the 24-month new-director exemption under the policy, so the TSR underperformance trigger does not apply to her; she brings relevant legal and technology expertise and serves on the audit committee as an independent director.

✓ FOR
Phil Evershed⚑ Joined March 2025 — within 24-month new-director exemption

Evershed joined the board in March 2025, which is within the 24-month new-director exemption, so the TSR underperformance trigger does not apply; he brings substantial investment banking and financial expertise and serves as audit committee chair, and the proxy confirms all directors met the 75% meeting attendance threshold.

✓ FOR
Jerry Naumoff⚑ Joined November 2024 — within 24-month new-director exemption; son is a non-executive employee of the company — note as minor flag but does not trigger independence concern under policy since relationship is not to senior management

Naumoff joined the board in November 2024, which is within the 24-month new-director exemption, so the TSR underperformance trigger does not apply; the proxy discloses that his son is a non-executive salaried employee, which is a relationship worth noting but does not rise to the level of a familial tie to senior management that would require a vote against under the policy.

Three of the six director nominees — Pavlovski (CEO/founder), Cappuccio, and Milnes — have served since September 2022 and bear full accountability for Rumble's severe stock underperformance: the stock fell 26.5% over three years while the XLC communication services ETF rose 107.3%, a gap of 133.8 percentage points that far exceeds the policy's 30-point trigger threshold for companies with negative absolute returns; the five-year record is equally poor, so no mitigation applies for any of the three. The three newer directors — Biber (January 2025), Evershed (March 2025), and Naumoff (November 2024) — are all within the 24-month new-director exemption and receive FOR votes.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

Chris Pavlovski

Total Comp

$4,623,727

Prior Support

N/A

⚑ Pay-for-performance misalignment: stock down 26.5% over 3 years vs XLC ETF up 107.3% (-133.8pp gap) while above-benchmark incentive pay was awarded⚑ Emerging growth company exempt from mandatory Say on Pay vote — no prior vote history available⚑ Large 'All Other Compensation' component ($893,156) including $807,076 tax liability advance on behalf of CEO inflates total pay figure⚑ Pay mix concern: fixed salary ($1,018,744) represents approximately 22% of total, but total package includes significant non-performance-based 'other compensation'

Rumble is an emerging growth company and is exempt from the mandatory Say on Pay vote requirement, meaning there is no prior year vote result to reference; however, the compensation structure raises pay-for-performance concerns because the stock fell 26.5% over three years while the XLC ETF rose 107.3% — a gap of 133.8 percentage points — yet the CEO received total compensation of $4,623,727 including above-benchmark variable pay (bonus of $229,239, stock awards of $620,591, and option awards of $1,861,997), which is inconsistent with the shareholder experience over the same period. Additionally, $807,076 of the CEO's 'other compensation' consists of a tax advance paid by the company on his behalf, which, while described as reimbursable, functions as an interest-free loan from shareholders and is a governance concern; taken together, the incentive pay is not aligned with the significant stock underperformance shareholders have experienced.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Baker Tilly US, LLP

Tenure

1 yrs

Audit Fees

$1,665,162

Non-Audit Fees

$106,575

Baker Tilly was appointed in June 2025 following the merger of predecessor auditor Moss Adams into Baker Tilly, giving it less than one year of tenure — far below the 25-year threshold that would raise independence concerns; the non-audit fees of $106,575 (consisting of internal controls reporting work) represent approximately 6.4% of audit fees of $1,665,162, well below the 50% threshold that would trigger a vote against.

Overall Assessment

Rumble's 2026 annual meeting presents two formal proposals — director elections and auditor ratification — with no mandatory Say on Pay vote (the company is exempt as an emerging growth company, though compensation concerns are addressed above as an analytical matter). The key governance concern is severe stock underperformance: Rumble's shares have fallen 26.5% over three years while the XLC communication services ETF rose 107.3%, a gap that triggers against votes for the three longest-serving directors (Pavlovski, Cappuccio, and Milnes); the three newer directors added in late 2024 and early 2025 are within the new-director exemption window and receive for votes, and Baker Tilly's ratification is straightforward given its recent appointment and clean fee structure.

Filing date: April 24, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence