Proxyanalyst LogoProxyanalyst
CompaniesSpecial SituationsExplorerAbout
Terms and Conditions & Privacy PolicySitemap

FORTIVE CORP (FTV)

Sector: Industrials

ExecutivesDirectorsTrendsAnnual MeetingProxy Filings
    Home/Companies/FTV/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

FORTIVE CORP · Meeting: June 9, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

8

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

8 FOR
✓ FOR
Daniel L. Comas

No overboarding, attendance above 75%, relevant financial expertise, and FTV's 3-year return of +27.5% outperforms the peer group median of +21.0% by +6.5pp, well below the 65pp threshold needed to trigger a vote against.

✓ FOR
Sharmistha Dubey

No overboarding concerns (announcing retirement from Match Group board), serves as independent Chair, strong technology and governance background, and peer-relative TSR trigger does not apply given FTV's outperformance of peer median.

✓ FOR
Rejji P. Hayes

Serves as a sitting CFO (not CEO) so the sitting-CEO overboarding rule does not apply, holds one outside public board seat, strong financial expertise, and peer TSR trigger does not apply.

✓ FOR
Wright L. Lassiter III

No overboarding issues, strong healthcare and operational leadership experience relevant to FTV's Advanced Healthcare Solutions segment, and peer TSR trigger does not apply.

✓ FOR
Kate D. Mitchell

No overboarding concerns, over 40 years of technology industry experience, and peer TSR trigger does not apply given FTV's positive outperformance versus peer median.

✓ FOR
Gregory J. Moore

No overboarding, relevant medical technology and AI expertise aligned with FTV's healthcare segment, and peer TSR trigger does not apply.

✓ FOR
Jeannine Sargent

No overboarding, extensive industrial technology and operations leadership experience, and peer TSR trigger does not apply.

✓ FOR
Olumide Soroye

As CEO and director, subject to the same TSR trigger as other directors, but FTV's 3-year return outperforms the peer median by +6.5pp, well within the 65pp threshold, so no trigger applies; also exempt from TSR concern given he only became CEO in June 2025.

All eight director nominees receive a FOR vote. FTV's 3-year price return of +27.5% outperforms the disclosed compensation peer group median of +21.0% by +6.5pp, far below the 65pp underperformance threshold required to trigger votes against directors. No director is overboarded, all met the 75% attendance threshold, the board discloses a skills matrix, audit committee members have financial expertise, and there are no independence or familial relationship concerns among the nominees.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Olumide O. Soroye

Total Comp

$14,405,012

Prior Support

86.5%%

The prior year say-on-pay vote received 86.5% support, well above the 70% threshold, and the company has demonstrated ongoing responsiveness to shareholder feedback by strengthening performance conditions, increasing the share of pay tied to relative total shareholder return, removing the floor payout on the TSR component, and planning further improvements for 2026. CEO total compensation of approximately $14.4 million reflects a significant transition year that included a new-CEO appointment and a major business separation, with 91% of target pay performance-based and 79% in equity, satisfying the policy's pay-mix requirements. FTV's 3-year total shareholder return of +27.5% outperforms the disclosed peer group median of +21.0%, so above-benchmark incentive pay is consistent with shareholder experience and the pay-for-performance alignment check does not trigger a vote against.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$12,378,687

Non-Audit Fees

$4,721,891

Non-audit fees (combining audit-related fees of $225,000 and tax fees of $4,496,891, totaling approximately $4,721,891) represent about 38% of audit fees of $12,378,687, well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns. EY is a Big 4 firm fully appropriate for a company of FTV's size and complexity. Auditor tenure is not disclosed in the filing, so the tenure trigger does not fire per policy.

Overall Assessment

Fortive's 2026 annual meeting presents a clean ballot with three standard proposals — director elections, say-on-pay, and auditor ratification — all receiving FOR votes under this policy. The company's stock has meaningfully outperformed its compensation peer group over three years, compensation is heavily performance-linked with ongoing improvements in response to shareholder feedback, and auditor fees are within acceptable independence thresholds.

Filing date: April 29, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

15 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

AMEAmetek Inc
ADSKAutodesk, Inc.
ECLEcolab, Inc.
HONHoneywell International Inc.
IEXIDEX Corporation
ITWIllinois Tool Works Inc.
MTDMettler-Toledo International Inc.
ROKRockwell Automation Inc.
ROPRoper Technologies, Inc
NOWServiceNow, Inc.
STESTERIS plc
SYKStryker Corporation
SNPSSynopsys, Inc.
TRMBTrimble Inc.
ZBRAZebra Technologies Corporation