MARINEMAX INC (HZO)
Sector: Consumer Discretionary
2026 Annual Meeting Analysis
MARINEMAX INC · Meeting: March 3, 2026
Directors FOR
3
Directors AGAINST
0
Say on Pay
FOR
Auditor
FOR
Director Elections
Election of Three Class I Directors
McGill has served as director since February 2019 (over 24 months), but HZO's 3-year TSR of -16% outperforms the peer group median of -41.3% by +25.3 percentage points, well above the 20pp underperformance threshold required to trigger a negative vote, so no TSR flag applies; no other disqualifying flags identified.
Almeida joined the board in August 2025, which is within the 24-month new-director exemption window, so he is fully exempt from the TSR trigger; no other disqualifying flags identified.
Schiappa joined the board in September 2025, which is within the 24-month new-director exemption window, so he is fully exempt from the TSR trigger; no other disqualifying flags identified.
All three Class I nominees pass the policy screens. The company's 3-year stock performance of -16%, while negative in absolute terms, beats its disclosed peer group median of -41.3% by more than 25 percentage points, so the TSR underperformance trigger does not fire for any long-tenured director. Both newer directors (Almeida and Schiappa) are within the 24-month exemption period. No overboarding, independence, attendance, or familial relationship concerns were identified for any nominee.
Say on Pay
✓ FORCEO
W. Brett McGill
Total Comp
$6,270,195
Prior Support
99%%
CEO total compensation of approximately $6.27 million is reasonable for the head of a ~$580 million market cap specialty retailer, and the prior year Say on Pay vote received overwhelming support of approximately 99%, indicating no unresolved shareholder concern. The pay structure is appropriately weighted toward variable pay — roughly 84% of the CEO's total compensation comes from stock awards and performance-based cash bonuses, well above the 50-60% minimum required by policy, and the performance awards paid out at only about 37% of target in fiscal 2025, reflecting genuine pay-for-performance alignment as business results declined. The company has a compliant clawback policy in place, and for fiscal 2026 the committee made further improvements including extending the performance period on equity awards to three years and adding a relative total shareholder return modifier, which are positive governance steps.
Auditor Ratification
✓ FORAuditor
KPMG LLP
Tenure
N/A
Audit Fees
N/A
Non-Audit Fees
N/A
KPMG is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of MarineMax's size and complexity. The auditor fee table provided in the filing context does not contain a parseable fee breakdown, so the non-audit fee ratio trigger cannot be evaluated; per policy, when tenure cannot be confirmed from disclosed data, the tenure trigger does not fire. No material restatements were identified in the proxy. In the absence of confirmed disqualifying data, the default FOR vote applies.
Overall Assessment
MarineMax's 2026 annual meeting ballot presents four proposals, three of which are standard recurring items. The director slate, Say on Pay, and auditor ratification all pass the applicable policy screens and receive FOR recommendations; the equity plan share increase request is outside the scope of this policy and receives no recommendation. The most notable positive signal is that despite a challenging operating environment that produced a net loss in fiscal 2025, executive variable compensation paid out well below target and the board has proactively strengthened the pay-for-performance structure for fiscal 2026.
Compensation Peer Group
15 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing